vakkotaur: (computer)


For some time now, since at least August, I've been acquiring parts and building up a computer (for [livejournal.com profile] scarletcharnel). The hardware was the easy part. I had a bit of a time with a Linux (Xubuntu) install to test things out. I purposely held off on installing Windows (not my choice of OS, but this isn't my machine) until I had all the hardware that it would have to deal with. I did not want to deal with whatever nonsense Windows has about authentication and hardware changes. So, after I confirmed that everything was working, I set out to install Windows (7, 64 bit, Professional). And I cussed and grumbled more than I had in years.

It's actually fairly simple, but only to someone already familiar with Windows quirks. For a confirmed Linux user, it's an exercise in frustration as Windows consistently fails to do the right thing. So, here goes, for my own future reference, as through this I wound up with an extra copy of Windows (7, 64 bit, Home Premium) and might yet go though this again.

Zeroeth, set BIOS and such to use EFI mode, even for the DVD/CD drive. Yes, this is important. At least for the Windows install. If you do not do this, Windows will insist it cannot install to a GPT (bye bye MBR, we're using big disks now) partition. Linux will simply go where you point it. Set up the disk as GPT. I recommend PartedMagic for disk partitioning (gparted is your friend), re-sizing, and all the badgering you'll need to do make Windows co-exist with Linux.

First, be prepared to fully back up everything or lose it. Windows does not play nice with other operating systems and demands to be the first (and "only") thing installed on a fresh disk. Stupid, but it is Windows where stupid is standard. Now install Windows. It will whine that the system that booted many times just fine might not boot do to configuration issues. Windows is an idiot. Ignore the idiot and go on with the install. It will create three partitions: an EFI boot partition, a Windows recovery partition, and a Windows partition.

Next is to shrink the Windows partition to not take up the whole disk (besides the efi/boot and restore partitions). Allegedly Windows can do this itself, but I don't trust it any farther than one could comfortably spit a rat. I used gparted from PartedMagic and shrank the Windows partition. I also created another NTFS partition for the user that is at least somewhat isolated from the main Windows partition. If Windows must be reinstalled, it can do upgrades or repairs with less (though not zero) risk to the user data. Boot into Windows and let it cope with the new size of the world, which it will whine about. Too bad. In a glimmer of hope, Windows will see and mount the new user partition.

Unless you want to deal with the Linux install right away, now is probably the time to hunt down all the boxes the hardware came in and dig out the manufacturer's driver disks. You get to play disk swap for a while installing everything as Microsoft hasn't got a nice easy software repository to make life simple and easy. Also, it might need you to give drivers for drop-dead common networking hardware and stuff like USB ports. Yes, Windows really is an idiot.

Reboot with PartedMagic and use gparted to create the Linux partitions. I kept it fairly minimal with / and /home and swap. /home by itself for the same reason as the separate Windows user partition: keeping OS and user data somewhat isolated just makes sense. I made the Linux partitions (aside from swap, of course) ext4.

Another reboot with the Linux install disk and, if the hardware & software get along (I don't know why, but *buntu 12.04 tends to go black screen on new hardware for me) you simply install. As I wanted Xubuntu 12.04 and it wasn't behaving as it ought, I installed Xubuntu 11.04 and let it update itself to 12.04 when it asked. Yes, that 12.04 is goofy this way shows lack of clue somewhere, but at least I had networking and such right off. (Windows: Durrr, what's a USB port? Linux: Oh, hey, I found this camera on one of the USB ports, want me to take your picture for the login screen?). At the end, install grub2 to the / partition.

Use Parted Magic again, but don't let it boot up by itself. Stop it at the first graphic screen and choose Extras and have it boot with grub. It will find the Linux install and boot from there (just using the hard drive will boot Windows without any choice). Do NOT waste time with EasyBCD to try to cajole Windows into doing the right thing. EasyBCD doesn't (yet?) handle EFI so it will only waste time. In Linux, run the updates as needed, and be sure the correct video driver gets installed - don't want to end up with a blackscreen from Xubuntu 12.04 again.

Find and install BootRepair. Sadly, this is not in the *buntu repository so a bit of command line work and using an alternate repository will be needed. Run it. Decide which operating system should boot by default. In this case, I decided it ought to be Windows. Not what I'd do for myself, but again it's not my machine.

Enjoy dual boot. Set up Windows, set up Linux, installing whatever programs seem to be good to have around. One of them is Ext2Read which will let Windows see (read only, unless you like living dangerously) the Linux ext4 partitions. This is better than leaving Windows to claim they need to be formatted. Windows, by itself, doesn't grok much in the way of filesystems.

vakkotaur: (computer)


Since I'm asking about Windows software, I might as well ask a bit more. I know there are some programs that can vastly improve the experience of using Windows, such as using Foxit in place of Acrobat, and Opera (or FireFox, or.. pretty much anything) in place of IE. What others are there? Any programs that are on the "The Windows install isn't done until I download *this* to make it tolerable" list? Free preferred. Cross-platform is a bonus.

I hope to download these at home (where there is DSL) and burn a CD for my next visit to [livejournal.com profile] sistaur. Even with drive time, it'll likely be faster than downloading on the dialup connection.

vakkotaur: (computer)


Last weekend I got [livejournal.com profile] sistaur's computer into a reasonably useful state, but in doing so removed an (outdated) anti-virus program or two. Since it is Windows (XP), I suppose there ought to be some sort of anti-malware program. The problem is, I have no idea about that. I haven't had to deal with keeping Windows secure for some time.

So I am looking for recommendations. The anti-{adware,spyware,virus,whatever} should not drag system performance down noticeably, and would ideally be free. Any recommendations?

vakkotaur: (computer)


I made the switch from Windows to Linux a few years ago. At first I ran two computers side by side and switched between Windows and Linux. As I got more comfortable with Linux I used the Windows machine less and less. When the Linux machine had hardware trouble (a worn out CPU fan) I used the Windows machine and found I hadn't used it in over a year. It's been about another year and I don't recall using it, or really wanting to.

Last night I blew away the Windows install. Right now percheron has no operating system, just a partitioned and formatted disk. Tonight I plan to replace the CD burner with a DVD burner and replace the 8 GB HDD with a 40 GB HDD. And then I get to decide just what I want to put on it. I expect percheron will be my scratch system that I try a few things out on.

Windows isn't completely gone from my machines as there is another older and even less frequently used Windows computer in the basement, and there is a DOS/WfW partition on one of my computers in the machine room. There is also an older, broken laptop (it runs, but doesn't close) with 95 on it which is out of service and effectively in storage. I expect the computer in the basement will get a different operating system sometime, and the one in the machine room, well, that partition is small and out of the way which means my last Windows installation that might see any activity, and there's very little, will likely be WfW 3.11, of all things.

vakkotaur: (computer)


I've been using Linux as my primary desktop OS at home for a couple years now and a few days ago when I fired up the Win2K machine for something (which the Linux machine can now do) I looked at the log that the UPS monitor keeps. I'd used the Windows machine in 2002, but only once or twice in 2003 and 2004. If I hadn't had trouble with the CPU fan on the Linux machine, it would have been the first time in 2005 I'd started the Windows machine.

I've also been pondering a Linux distribution that might not be the one I'm currently running (Mandrake) but I'd like to test things on a real full install first - without taking down my primary machine. The only machine I have that would be considered reasonably new enough to test most modern full featured Linux distributions is the Windows machine. I've been trying to think what reason I could have to keep Windows on it, since a re-install of Windows would be an unwelcome task. The UPS monitor logs show that I certainly don't need Windows regularly. The last thing I needed it for was to make mp3 files and Linux can do that. About the only thing I can think of might be playing games but I don't play games. And the only game I do have is on a CD with a Mac version, so if the bug did bite I could play that on the iMac.

I know this. I've thought it over. And yet I keep having this nagging feeling that I'm overlooking something, and it might even be important. But if it was, wouldn't I have used Windows (at home) more than twice a year?




Addendum: [livejournal.com profile] jmaynard pointed out that I could swap hard drives and not really lose the Windows install. It would be a bit awkward to put back, but not too big a deal. And we do have a couple "small" 20 G drives that would do for what I want. That seems to be the way to go.

vakkotaur: (computer)


...but it can be made more tolerable than it is "out of the box."

Generally when I find I need some application for Windows, the first place I look is TinyApps which has links to programs that are for DOS or Window(95/98/NT/2k/XP) and small enough to fit on a floppy. Even if floppies are fading into history, it's a nice measurement. A small program doesn't take up much space, probably doesn't take up much memory, and has fewer places for bugs to hide. Also, small is beautiful - generally there isn't anything unnecessary, like ugly style-breaking default skins.

I had need of a stopwatch today. Looking at TinyApps (under Misc) I found a simple timer. There was also a simple calendar. Something I've gotten used to on Linux is being able to click on the clock and get a simple calendar that I can flip through the months. No scheduling or anything, it just shows me the days of the month(s). It sounds trivial, but it's one of those little things a person starts to just expect. So on Windows it's annoying when it's not there. I don't have it exactly as on Linux, but now there is a calendar icon next to the clock. And now XP is just that little bit more tolerable.

vakkotaur: (computer)


That message is one I expect to see if I made changes to some file and tried to exit the program without having saved the file. That's fine. I like that reminder. It's useful and has saved me headaches and re-work.

What I do not like is using Word, saving the file, printing it, and then being asked if I want to save changes. Huh? I made no changes. I printed the file. Printing is not editing. Or with Excel, I open a spreadsheet, look at it, make no changes - not even moving the highlighted cell or scrollbars! - and when I close the thing I get asked if I want to save changes. There were no changes. Why ask if I want to save changes when there aren't any?

Is it any wonder I prefer to use third party software whenever possible?

vakkotaur: (no harfing)


It took (yet another) a Google search for "Windows Explorer Annoyances" that lead to a page about Windows Explorer harf on Windows Me but, finally, I have what *I* want. The trick? Command-line switches that XP's help seems not to mention.

How about them apples? Windows XP is what you get when you infect the stability of Windows 2000 with the poor user interface choices of Windows Me.

Target: C:\WINDOWS\explorer.exe /n,/e,C:\home\neubauer\

Now I have what I want rather than what some imbecile in Redmond believes I should have.

vakkotaur: (mushroom cloud)


Windows XP sucks. That is all.

vakkotaur: (mushroom cloud)


Windows Explorer in XP, or whatever XP calls the file manager, is trying to be helpful. That means it is really being annoying. On the desktop is a shortcut for "Documents" that opens the file manager to a documents directory. This directory is, however, not the one I really want. I want C:\home\neubauer instead.

I figured I'd just change the shortcut and give it the properties I want. It almost worked. It will give me direct access to C:\home\neubauer\ BUT that's now seemingly a ghost of the real thing. I'm not really there in the directory tree where I can, if I want to, easily jump to another directory, like C:\usr\bin or some other that I want to get to fast from time to time.

Instead of doing what I want, the system is trying to guess what I need and getting it wrong. It wants to be helpful in the worst way. And it is that: helpful in the worst way. I don't want this incompetent help. I want it to get out of my way. The Win95 box's Windows Explorer comes up at C: and shows the whole directory tree. That is acceptable. At least I can navigate directly from there without having to go through the extra step of clicking a "Folders" button. Even Windows 2000 got it right. But XP just had to go improve things the Microsoft way. The result: it sucks.

I've put up with this silly XP behavior for a few weeks now and my patience is running out. Anyone know how, or even if, the XP file manager can be whacked into doing the right thing? I haven't looked into replacement file managers just yet, but it may come to that.

vakkotaur: Centaur holding bow - cartoon (Default)


Currently running...

OS - Win2k

TeraTerm - ssh to thebrain for mail & news.
mIRC - WTnet: #Warnercafe, #Centaur, #unixgeek, the odd query window.
Windows Explorer - Some things are just done easier in a file manager.
TextPad - Tabbed text editing, with context highlighting and stuff.
Audacity - so I can go from tape (yes, tape) to mp3.
Opera - Web browsing, on my terms.
IrfanView - image viewing.

Bellkin Bulldog - UPS monitor
Week Scheduler - simple timer/reminder

Profile

vakkotaur: Centaur holding bow - cartoon (Default)
Vakkotaur

March 2024

S M T W T F S
     12
3 456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 3 January 2026 16:55
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios