vakkotaur: Centaur holding bow - cartoon (mad science)


Not like we didn't know that, but this was brought home to me in a very effective manner, though one that might not make sense to others without some explanation.

Back in 1972 if you wanted a typical (as seen nowadays) red dot laser you needed to get a Helium-Neon laser tube which was not cheap then. A very quick web search shows that a low end 'HeNe' tube today is about $60. And as with most tube gear, a high voltage power supply was needed to make the thing work. While one can find such things nowadays for about $20, back then it was not the case. My father had managed to buy a "replacement" laser tube and used a fancy (so it seemed then) toroidal transformer and power transistors (solid state has made a lot of progress since then, if you hadn't noticed... often power devices still used tubes then.) and with those built a power supply for the tube that could run off of 12 Volts DC. This made it "portable" or at least transportable. It could be used in a car.

The night it was finished enough to be used that way, my mother was in the hospital either expecting or having given birth to my sister. My father was visiting her while I was at home or more likely at my grandparent's house. Luckily it was a foggy night and he told her he'd have it on for a bit before he left the parking lot. With the fog, the beam was visible and my mother saw it out the hospital room window.

As there were no laser pointers, this thing was unique, or at least was so in our area. This led to various shenanigans with it. Aiming it at the sign that indicates a stop light ahead made the red circle in the image of the stoplight look lit up like a real stoplight. Tracing the beam quickly along the prismatic bricks of a bar must've looked at least somewhat light emergency (police, fire) lights inside and got folks to come out to look around.

At the A&W root beer stand (a drive-in eatery back then) the laser was once positioned in my father's lap, held low so it could not be seen from other vehicles. Then the spot was projected on the sun visor or headliner of the adjacent vehicle. When the odd red dot was noticed the driver tried to point at it to his passenger (we assume husband & wife) but as he pointed, Pa would shift the dot a bit and the pointing finger followed, but the shift reversed and for a bit it was sort of a game of tag to try to point at the curious dot. My mother had to hold herself back some to let the beam pass and also had to suppress laughter at this little game.

Now, most of these things I did not witness myself, or do not recall, but I heard of them years after the fact. One thing I do recall is a big (well to me, I was 5 years old, everything was kinda big to me) pickup, I think the license plate indicate Montana but I am unsure, parked opposite us at the root beer stand. A map went up in the truck. The laser was quickly brought to bear and the mysterious red dot shown through the map and was scanned around just a bit. *FWIP!* That map came down faster than one might imagine and the people in the truck looked around for... whatever that was.

I don't know how long this reign of peculiar red dot event went on, but eventually the laser tube leaked (give the pressures involved, air got in to it) and the fun was over. The tube was not replaced. It was expensive and the fun had been had.

For years I pondered rigging up something similar, and for a while I even had at least a laser tube and power supply (by then, the mid-late 1980s, such things could be found used & inexpensive at hamfests) though I never rigged it all up to be portable or transportable.

Laser diodes (and diode lasers) had been around for some time, but they were infra-red and thus while useful in some application, not useful for visual pointing or amusement. And then technical progress brought about visible light laser diodes, which were expensive - at first. But like other solid state devices, progress meant rapid cost deflation and soon pocket laser pointers made into boardrooms, then classrooms, and eventually got to where you could buy one off of a peg at Shopko or K-Mart.

And as that happened, more people experienced the red dot and grew to know what it was. The joke didn't work anymore as the mystery was gone. Now it was "Alright, who's playing with a %^$@ laser pointer?" rather than "What the hell was that?"

But it's 2014 and the ultimate progression has occurred. A few days ago I bought a combination LED flashlight (there's that progress again - early LEDs were rather dim) and laser pointer - batteries included - at a dollar store. While it's 2014 and not 2012, one inflation calculating site had data up to 2012. Assuming the dollar hadn't declined much in value in the last couple years (not entirely true) today's dollar is roughly equal to about 18 cents in 1972. And for that "18 cents" of 1972[1] I have a smaller, less power hungry, more capable, and truly portable (it could hang on a keyring) device.

So, it's really not 1972 anymore.




[1] Alright, with sales tax it might be up to a whole quarter.

vakkotaur: (kick)


One quotation from the Star Wars movies bugs me. Yoda's "Do. Or do not. There is no try." may be well meant as a call to action, but is ultimately wrong. Of course there is a try! If people lived by "Do. Or do not." there'd be no significant progress of any kind. It's the try that changes people, changes history, changes the world. Should Edison (or anyone else) have "done not" rather than try? He went through how many failed filament materials before finding one that was usable? That's an awful lot of try, there. Should a kid keep crawling rather than try to walk? Of course not. The idea is absurd. Should the Wrights not have bothered trying to fly? It wasn't as if they were born with wings. "Do. Or do not." suggests not bothering to attempt anything unless it's a sure thing. There's a word for that sort of thing: stagnation.

A world of tries is, true, also a world of failures. But which world would you rather live in: A world of thousands and even millions of tries and failures, before any eventual success, or a world with no successes at all?

vakkotaur: (magritte)


There's likely a simple, though maybe not easy, answer that I've just plain missed. One of the things I've wondered about is what could be called the bootstrap problem. How can crude tools be used to make less crude tools?

That is, you start with sticks and stones, and you eventually end up with precision machined parts accurate to tolerances that may be too small to see. It can be done. That much is plain since humanity did it. But although it's been proven possible, it seems counter-intuitive. It requires crude things to make finer things, repeatedly.

A devastated, but once advanced, civilization should in theory be able to recover faster than it built itself up the first time - if it permits itself that rebuilding. What's needed to do this? A good many things are only "obvious" after the fact. By the time a civilization understands something well enough to bring it to perfection, that civilization has likely discovered something else that even though imperfect is so much better that the first thing is rendered obsolete. But the knowledge of earlier technologies isn't useless - if nothing else, it'd be useful to rebuild fast and skip all the fiddling around between advances.

vakkotaur: Centaur holding bow - cartoon (Default)


October 4, 1957: Sputnik I is the first artificial satellite.

October 4, 2004: Space Ship One carries people into space for the second time in two weeks.


It's still the dawn of the space age.

vakkotaur: Centaur holding bow - cartoon (Default)


This cartoon makes a good point.

vakkotaur: Centaur holding bow - cartoon (Default)


Then: A communist country launched a manned space capsule into orbit, before non-communists managed to even get a sub-orbital manned space flight. That was, of course, the U.S.S.R. and the U.S.A.

Now: A communist country launched a manned space capsule into orbit, before non-communists managed to even get a sub-orbital manned space flight. This is China and the folks trying for the X-prize. This time it's not really a race between countries.

This time there is a race, but the X-prize folks are racing each other. They aren't a major, or even a minor, government seeking propaganda points. They want the prize money, sure, but likely will spend so much to get it that it really isn't the point. The point is making a successful space flight. Ideally to be the first private endeavor to do so. But even after someone claims the prize, the rest will not just quit and go home.

There will be more private space shots, with various designs. Some will work. Some will flop. Some of it may look like newsreels of the early days of aviation, only with more spectacular and painful failures. It may look like a free-for-all, which it should. Someone will figure out ways to make money, whether by launching satellites, or by selling rides to people willing and able to pay, or perhaps something else still.

Sure, space has been reached before, but each time by governments. And that shows that getting there is possible. It can be done. But the interesting thing is about to happen. The frontier is about to open up. And maybe, finally, some of the good things we thought might be in our future at the beginning of the 'space age' will start to happen. We will be living in interesting times.

vakkotaur: (no harfing)


Some several decades back musical recordings were in the form of cylindrical records that fit onto players made to play such cylindrical records. The format was similar, if lesser diameter, than the first crude model that Edison had a worker build. The standard that was eventually settled on for cylinder records played about two minutes of music.

As things progressed a different format took over, the disc phonograph. This was incompatible even though the principle of operation was the same. There were advantages to the disc. It took less space so was easier to store, both in inventory and in a home collection. It was easier (and therefore cheaper) to manufacture.

And, eventually, the phonograph disc too was replaced. The Compact Disc took over almost completely. And some are arguing the CD's days are numbered even now.

The interesting thing is that nobody is preventing me or you or anyone else from making phonographs or records. In fact, there are places that do still make phonograph discs and you can still buy turntables if you look and are willing to pay.

That's just disc records. How many commercial makers of phonograph cylinders do you know about? Probably the same as I do: none. There is not much chance of getting a cylinder of the latest hit single. And can you get a commercial cylinder phonograph? Sure you can maybe find an old one at an antiques dealer. What about a new one? There's nothing illegal about making new cylinder phonographs, nor is there any law standing in the way of cylinder record production. And yet neither are to be found, at least not beyond enthusiastic experimenters.

This isn't about sound recording formats, not really. This is not about abortion either, not really, but I'm going to mention that here all the same. Abortion is, in the U.S., currently legal. Some would like to make it illegal. Others push back to keep it legal. Those opposing the procedure are taking the wrong approach. Making things illegal does not necessarily make them go away. Marijuana, as just one example, is illegal in the U.S. It has not gone away. And yet legal things, like the cylinder record, are quite scarce. The difference is alternatives and relevance. There are alternatives to cylinder records - and they're so much better that they are chosen by all but a very few. The cylinder record is irrelevant nowadays. Make abortion irrelevant, have real alternatives so it simply is not needed, and it will fade. It won't go away completely. But if one is against something, isn't better to have only a tiny bit of it than to have a great lot of it?

But this isn't about abortion. Or illegal drugs. Or vehicles with low gas mileage. Or petroleum. Or any number of things some people would like to tell other people not to do or use. It's not even about an old sound recording format. Though it could be, in a way, about all of them.

This is really about making things go away without getting people angry and ready to fight against the change. To get rid of something, it must be replaced with something seen as better. Once that is done, it will pretty much go away without needing any laws telling it to do so.

Profile

vakkotaur: Centaur holding bow - cartoon (Default)
Vakkotaur

March 2024

S M T W T F S
     12
3 456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 17 July 2025 19:48
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios