vakkotaur: Centaur holding bow - cartoon (time)
[personal profile] vakkotaur


As of June 22 US law changed and cigarette makers could no longer use terms like light, ultra light, medium, low, or mild. For most non-(cigarette)-smokers this change means little and might have been nothing more than an "Oh, that's interesting" article. For smokers, it has lead to some confusion, depending on preference. And even some non-smokers, those who work in places where cigarettes are sold, are affected as they have to not only translate between the old term that people are familiar with to the new terms or looks that are actually present, but also explain why the pack doesn't say "light" or such. To make it bit more confusing, there are a few different standards of what is done now, derived from earlier packaging, depending upon brand.

See this article or this one for details.

No big deal, right? It's just the same old stuff with differently labeled packs. Except some people are set in their ways and expectations. "It has to say 'Medium' on the box." gets awkward when that's now "Red Label" and someone simply cannot grasp that things have changed in name but it's exact same product. Or someone who buys softpacks (which sell slower than the hard packs or flip top boxes) still sees 'light' from the old stock that has yet to rotate out and then encounters 'blue' or 'gold' or such for the first time. "Don't you have lights?" And then one gets to explain why they are getting "golds" or "blues" instead now.

Date: 8 Oct 2010 16:09 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kiwihunter8.livejournal.com
Those articles were both very interesting. I've never been a smoker but I've had friends who religiously stuck to their Marlboro Lights thinking the health risks were lessened. I had no idea the tobacco companies were actually claiming that referred to flavor.

Date: 8 Oct 2010 17:24 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vakkotaur.livejournal.com
Well, that's what they're claiming now. Honesty is not to be expected. Or rather, a very select version of Exact Truth. Recall the congressional hearing where the cigarette company execs all said they don't add nicotine? They were telling the truth, but in an exact way. They did not add nicotine. They treated the tobacco with ammonia (I think) to make the nicotine already there more readily available or absorbed.

The first stab at dealing with the cancer findings of the 1950s was the filtered cigarette... and one of the first ones (if not the first) actually managed to make cigarettes more dangerous. The filter was asbestos. Oops. After many failed experiments the cigarette makers just gave up on a safe product. I can recommend a read of Iain Gately's book Tobacco: A Cultural History of How an Exotic Plant Seduced Civilization.

Date: 9 Oct 2010 02:11 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hellboy78.livejournal.com
Welcome to my own personal P.i.t.a working for Albertsons grocery store. We sell all of the above examples of cigarettes and I've encountered pretty much every nit-picky scenario you could imagine with said confusions. *facepalm* People are starting to learn though, for the most part, now that it's been a couple months since the initial change. But there are still a few who haven't gotten the memo, so to speak. Ah, well, eh?

Date: 10 Oct 2010 13:00 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] setsu-p.livejournal.com
HARGH. Is that what that's all about? I kinda got the impression Wal-Mart was waging a petty war on menthol smokers by letting 'em all sell out. Granted, now you can get the regular Marlboros in red, gold and silver...but what about the menthols? Now it's just MENTHOL and uh.. "Special Blend no. 4796065.6" or something.

Dunno how noticeable it was with the regulars, but when it comes to menthols, there is a taste difference between full/light/ultra-lights.

I...have been snipping the fronts off my packs for years and just taking those when I go shopping. The cashiers either don't speak English or I don't depending on what time of day it is. It's much easier to just flash them a picture and say "carton please"... even if they still grab a single pack first.

Date: 10 Oct 2010 14:16 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vakkotaur.livejournal.com
The menthols are still out there. For Marlboro, they now have (tiny) words on the end/top of the box "gold pack" for light, "silver pack" for ultra. The blend numbers (27 and 54, I think, as well as Special) are still there as they don't imply any "lightness." The lighter menthols are in slightly lighter (ha!) greens, too. To add to the confusion, the 'full' menthol box has a (silver? gold?) stripe around it which makes it look like it might be light or ultra. At least the box is a darker green.

Date: 19 Oct 2010 15:04 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vakkotaur.livejournal.com
I also wonder if maybe the new 'Skyline' is an answer to the problem of 'menthol lights' being a green colored 'gold pack' that causes confusion. Or if it's Marlboro's reply to Camel Crush. I don't know.

Date: 30 Oct 2010 13:13 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] setsu-p.livejournal.com
I finally got a chance to quiz the girl behind the smokes counter about this the other day. Apparently the menthol ultra lights are now in a box that looks identical to the menthol lights...except the color of the stripe in the green chevron is SILVER.

This makes nothing easier.

Special blend in the easy-to-recognize and usually-in-stock carton is now my choice.

Profile

vakkotaur: Centaur holding bow - cartoon (Default)
Vakkotaur

March 2024

S M T W T F S
     12
3 456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 23 July 2025 00:46
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios