Actually a different Dean. And not even him, but some eager supporter thereof. An LJ-posting with bold text urgently urged, "Go see what Dem. the all powerful Selector picks for you!!"
The selector is here: http://www.selectsmart.com/president/
My results are that it doesn't pick a Dem. as most compatible. Nor even as second best. Nor even third best. In my case Bush (not a Democrat party member last I checked) came in second as around 80% compatible. And Phillip Howard of the Constitution Party came in third around 70%. But with 100% compatibility was... "Libertarian" with no specific candidate named. The most compatible (or rather, least incompatible) Dem. scored a mere 41%. Somehow I doubt that's what the Dean supporter expected.
I do wonder how the scale works. I would expect 0% on the low end, but Lyndon LaRouche falls all the way down to -15%. Aside from the curious mathematics, that bothers me not one little bit.
Lyons and Tygers and Beares, oh my...
Date: 25 Jun 2003 13:21 (UTC)I went to SelectSmart. Apparently I should vote for Dennis Kucinich (a Dem), who matched my ideas 100%. The Dean supporter would be happy to know that Dean came in second, at 94%.
The Green Party (no name) came in 6th at 82%.
The Socialist came in 15th at 61%.
The Libertarian - tied for 16th at 60% with Marcy Kaptur. (I only limited choices to those that have not dropped from the race - potential candidates got their percentages viewed by me.)
The highest ranked Republican was John McCain - 20th, with 29%. Bush came in 24th, with 13%.
The 25th through 27th place finishers (the bottom three), all scored below 0% - Tom Vilsack at -1%, and LaRouche and Wesley Clark tied for the bottom at -11%.