Date: 4 Nov 2008 18:55 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kinkyturtle.livejournal.com
Here in Texas, we use an electronic "eSlate" voting machine, but it's not actually touch-screen. It's got controls at the bottom: a dial for scrolling through selections, and four buttons labeled ENTER, PREV, NEXT, and CAST BALLOT.

So I selected "other" instead of "touch screen voting machine".

Date: 4 Nov 2008 18:58 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wendyzski.livejournal.com
Illinois has touch screens with a paper backup.

You enter your ballots on a touch screen, then at the end you review your choices on the screen and then your choices print out on a little rolly-paper cartridge-thing on the side for you to again check. Only after you review the paper backup and click OK does it record your ballot.

Date: 4 Nov 2008 19:00 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vakkotaur.livejournal.com
I think Nevada has something similar to that.

Date: 4 Nov 2008 19:26 (UTC)
ext_39907: The Clydesdale Librarian (Default)
From: [identity profile] altivo.livejournal.com
Not all of Illinois, though. A large part of the state uses the optical scan, which I like better. You mark a real paper ballot with a felt tip pen, and feed it into a machine that scans it on the spot. If you did something invalid, like voting for two candidates for the same office, the ballot gets spit back out and you can get a new one and try again. If it all reads OK, then the reader keeps it and stores the ballots inside. These can be reviewed manually for a recount if necessary, and are very easy to read with human eyes (unlike the infamous "hanging chads" on Florida punch cards.)

Date: 4 Nov 2008 19:39 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wendyzski.livejournal.com
At least in Chicago, most early-voting sites did not have the optical scan machines.

Date: 4 Nov 2008 19:52 (UTC)
ext_39907: The Clydesdale Librarian (Default)
From: [identity profile] altivo.livejournal.com
I think most of the early voting was done on the touch screens. They are more portable, and since early voting sites were not necessarily the same as the regular election day locations, it seemed logical to use them.

Date: 4 Nov 2008 20:09 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] melskunk.livejournal.com
As a comparison, until the very most recent election in Canada, the entire country voted one way: And X drawn in the circle beside the guy (or girl) you're voting for. That's it. Very low tech yet we always manage to get the election results in within 2 hours of the polls closing.

Date: 4 Nov 2008 23:11 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thecanuckguy.livejournal.com
For national and provincial elections, yes, but I can recall ballots where you complete the arrow with a black felt marker that's machine readable for civic governments going back about 15 years or so

The ballot would look something like this:



>>----     ---------> Candidate 1

>>----=====---------> Candidate 2

>>----     ---------> Candidate 3

>>----     ---------> Candidate 4


The ==s indicate a choice made for Candidate 2 by filling in the gap with felt pen.

Profile

vakkotaur: Centaur holding bow - cartoon (Default)
Vakkotaur

March 2024

S M T W T F S
     12
3 456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 10 January 2026 02:40
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios