27 April 2005

vakkotaur: (mushroom cloud)


Checking out DistroWatch to if there was any new or upgraded Linux or BSD distribution, I saw a supposedly new BSD, PCBSD. It looked promising. It's pretty much FreeBSD but with a supposedly friendlier installer and set up to be a desktop OS right off. This is something that BSD has been lacking. Sure, you run BSD on the desktop after some fiddling around, but many would prefer not to fiddle around thus.

So far, so good. Then I looked at the licensing and got a nasty surprise. The core was BSD licensed, of course, but "All software custom developed for PC-BSD is released under the GNU General Public License..." It's not BSD. It's a bad hybrid. Sure, I know some applications, such as KDE, are unavoidably GPL and it makes some sense to use them. But to specifically make improvements to a BSD and then license them under GPL is grating in its wrongness. I can only hope that BSD folks look at the idea and decide it'd be good to do it right. I don't want to see some addlepated chucklehead calling for a renaming to "GNU/BSD" - the avoidance of such idiocy is one of the more attractive features of BSD.

Profile

vakkotaur: Centaur holding bow - cartoon (Default)
Vakkotaur

March 2024

S M T W T F S
     12
3 456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 5 January 2026 21:29
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios