A Minnesota-ism
26 April 2005 13:25![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Or at least I never heard it before moving to Minnesota. Take a hot sandwich, such as turkey or roast beef, put mashed potatoes on top, and then cover that in gravy and what do you have? I'd call it a mess, or maybe inedible, and certainly unnecessary. Yet that is what gets called a commercial here. Turkey Commercial, Beef Commercial, and I don't know what other variations there are and I'm not sure I want to.
no subject
Date: 26 Apr 2005 18:28 (UTC)no subject
Date: 26 Apr 2005 18:49 (UTC)no subject
Date: 27 Apr 2005 01:03 (UTC)I'd find the meal as described to be weird, but not inedible (unlike various cabbage-based products I could name)
no subject
Date: 26 Apr 2005 18:34 (UTC)I haven't seen any since I moved to Minnesota; if I do, I'll be sure to ask the name.
no subject
Date: 26 Apr 2005 18:44 (UTC)no subject
Date: 26 Apr 2005 19:03 (UTC)Never heard of it either. What's the deal with putting muck on top of a sandwich? The point of a sandwich is that you can pick it up with your hands. This sounds like you'd need a knife and fork!
no subject
Date: 26 Apr 2005 19:21 (UTC)We used to do that with leftover turkey and gravy - but not the mashed potatoes. That sounds icky to me!
no subject
Date: 26 Apr 2005 19:26 (UTC)no subject
Date: 26 Apr 2005 19:43 (UTC)For those who, like myself, need to look that up (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&oi=defmore&q=define:cottage+pie).
Trenchers
Date: 26 Apr 2005 19:33 (UTC)This is actually a throwback to medieval times. Usually, food was served on a slab of bread known as a "trencher," hence referring to someone who likes his food as a "trencherman." The sammich as we know it is a late 18th century innovation credited (perhaps falsely) to the Earl of Sandwich, who wanted (so it is alleged) a meal on the go while he was gambling at cards. So KT, above, is right in one sense, in that this doesn't jibe with what we call a sammich today.
Personally, I like hot open faced sammiches.
Off Topic: Sammich?
Date: 26 Apr 2005 19:49 (UTC)Sammich? That's jarring. Granted I have heard it "sa-meech" a time a or two. I guess it's one of those things like "veggie" that are common but jarringly wrong to me. Sandwich. Vegetables (whether 'vej-e-tah-bles' or 'vej-tehbles). Perfectly good words. Maybe it's that 'veggies' and 'sammich' sound too much like how some folks saccharine talk to the very young that I don't much care for them.
Re: Off Topic: Sammich?
Date: 26 Apr 2005 20:04 (UTC)I've also seen it/heard it used as diner slang, when giving orders to the cook. Probably a way of shortening the phrase for quick information.
Startoons, when it was still around, had a bizarre little thing on its site, that revolved around an anthrop sandwich, named "Tuna Sammich." I think it was done as a joke, but one never knows.
Re: Off Topic: Sammich?
Date: 26 Apr 2005 20:53 (UTC)Re: Off Topic: Sammich?
Date: 26 Apr 2005 21:12 (UTC)As for stress, that changes with time and place, vide the Anglicism of /luh bor' a tor ee/ versus American /lab' ruh tor ee/. I recall reading about changes in stress in line from Shakespeare (Hamlet?) where "'tis sweet and commendable in thy nature" had the fourth word originally pronounced /com' end uh ble/ where we now say /com end' uh ble/.
Cabinets and such
Date: 26 Apr 2005 19:35 (UTC)Po'boy/hoagie/grinder/sub being one. In Rhode Island, milkshakes are known as "cabinets," allegedly because the first machines for making them came in fancy wooden cabinets.
Where MN would have received the idea for a "commercial" is something of a mystery, since it isn't obvious.
no subject
Date: 26 Apr 2005 19:43 (UTC)no subject
Date: 26 Apr 2005 20:54 (UTC)no subject
Date: 26 Apr 2005 21:02 (UTC)But we called it an "Open-faced sandwich".
Yuuuummmmmm.
no subject
Date: 26 Apr 2005 21:11 (UTC)And here I thought an "open-faced sandwich" simply didn't have the upper layer of bread. Though come to think of, it usually would have some sort of sauce (or gravy, if I was unfortunate - I know it's odd to many, but for me a sauce is a tolerable thing and a gravy is an abomination). But potatoes, if any, would be on the side. Or am I remembering things as I wish they had been rather than how they were?
no subject
Date: 26 Apr 2005 21:13 (UTC)no subject
Date: 26 Apr 2005 21:42 (UTC)Gravy, generally, is made of meat by-product - the stuff that drips away and such, while a sauce is something mixed up from ingredients separate from the dish on which it is to be used. At least that's my definition. I know there is "sausage gravy" or "milk and flour gravy" which should escape the gravy definition, but such gets used in a form of biscuit abuse that renders the biscuits looking like they were produced by a canine with a stomach complaint, which is most unappetizing.
no subject
Date: 26 Apr 2005 22:25 (UTC)Ewww. What a revoltng thought, no matter which way you approach it.
no subject
Date: 27 Apr 2005 00:01 (UTC)