"... $COLOR in color."

[vakkotaur]

One peeve some have is about color descriptions. "It was orange in color." is redundant since orange is clearly the color and "It was orange" conveys the same information. I just noticed a situation where the "..in color" line makes sense. While for most colors it is redundant there are some where it conveys necessary information. "The brick was gold in color." has a different meaning than "The brick was gold." The same applies to silver. Color names that are also material names need to be distinguished between mere color and actual material - at least in some cases. If the item described is clearly not the material ("The sunbather's skin was bronze."), then the argument against redundancy returns.

Comments

[cathyr19355.livejournal.com]

Sometimes this kind of redundancy is not a bug, it's a rhetorical device. I have no problem with the phrase "orange in color" if it necessary to give the tone of the sentence the right feel for the context, or to imitate the speech patterns of a particular character in a novel or play.

Most of the time, though, you're right; it's simply redundancy, perpetrated by someone too ignorant to know better or too careless to be concerned about word usage.